Uncategorized

PennyMac touts broker channel gains as earnings rebound

2024-04-25T01:17:31+00:00

PennyMac Financial Services reported some green shoots in its origination business, part of a larger earnings recovery that was somewhat dampened by hedging losses.The California mortgage giant posted a $39.3 million profit in the first quarter, following a $36.8 million net loss to close 2023. The rebound, also a 29% improvement from the same time last year, was driven in part by far smaller settlement obligations to technology rival Black Knight. The multichannel lender recorded slight  quarter-over-quarter declines in production pretax net income, coming in at $35.9 million, and overall volume of $21.7 billion. Its correspondent and broker gain-on-sale margins ticked up however, with the broker direct channel leaping from 79 basis points to close 2023 to 103 in the recent period. Its consumer direct lock volume was also up 35% quarterly. The company said it counts over 4,000 brokers, up 36% from the same time last year. PennyMac Chairman and CEO David Spector attributed the broker margin and population gains to his firm's technology and more jumbo home loan activity, among other reasons."There was a period of time a year or two back when there was irrational pricing taking place in this part of the market, and I think we've seen a kind of a return to more rational pricing," he said, appearing to refer to the wholesale pricing wars of yesteryear.The firm's servicing operations recorded $4.9 million in pretax net income in the first quarter, up from a $95.5 million loss in the last three-month stretch. PennyMac also saw $170 million in mortgage servicing rights fair value gains, a figure offset by $294.6 million in hedging declines for a $125 million total decline. Executives, responding to analyst questions about the hedging loss, said the company had an increased exposure to interest rate volatility and cited the inverted yield curve. "We were seeing pretty significant potential costs for maintaining our typical hedge position," said Daniel Perotti, senior managing director and chief financial officer. "We needed to identify if we wanted to accept those hedge costs or open up certain exposures." Company leaders said PennyMac has since repositioned its hedge in the second quarter to a "more traditional profile."PennyMac's revenue meanwhile wavered at $305.7 million ending March, down from the fourth quarter's $361.9 million mark and slightly up from $302.8 million at the same time last year. Spector and Perotti also addressed the company's Department of Veterans Affairs loan profile in speaking on the upcoming VA Servicing Purchase program, or VASP. The initiative is a successor to the VA's pandemic-era partial claim for its distressed borrowers.PennyMac counts 4,700 VA loans in a deep delinquency position, or $1.2 billion of unpaid principal balance among its vast servicing portfolio. Executives appeared cautiously optimistic when asked about VASP."Where we have potential concern today is around the moral hazard and how that could eventually play out," said Perotti. 

PennyMac touts broker channel gains as earnings rebound2024-04-25T01:17:31+00:00

CFPB offers specifics on servicing fees subject to crackdown

2024-04-24T21:18:13+00:00

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau circulated information about what sorts of mortgage servicing fee issues it's seen in examinations lately.The bureau said it's found problems with certain property inspection charges, fees that loan mods should eliminate and improperly labeled line items, according to its latest Supervisory Highlights report.CFPB Director Rohit Chopra spoke about the crackdown on mortgage fees Wednesday on a White House press call to discuss the Biden administration's efforts to eliminate so-called junk fees in many areas of the economy."Our CFPB oversight goes on site to these mortgage servicers and we found all sorts of illegal junk fees, prohibited property inspection fees, deceptive notices to homeowners violating loan modification rules for struggling borrowers," Chopra said on call with reporters that was live streamed on YouTube. "We really hope that our reforms in these markets are going to lead to more fair and competitive pricing," he continued. "I also think it's going to restore a little bit of trust that people really need in the banking system, because they're really tired of all of this fee creep across the economy."What follows are more details about the fees the bureau has been cracking down on and some other related concerns the CFPB identified in examinations between April and December of last year.Charges for excessive inspectionsIf a borrower has gone too long without making a payment, inspections often are supposed to occur, and servicers who pay for them may charge fees to consumers in certain instances.But there are some exceptions within major government-related mortgage investor Fannie Mae's guidelines where inspections should not occur. The bureau said it found those exceptions ignored in some cases."In total, servicers charged hundreds of borrowers fees for property inspections that were prohibited," the CFPB saidThere are exemptions if there's right-party contact or a full payment made in the last 30 days, a performing loss mitigation option or bankruptcy plan, according to the bureau.Failure to provide loss mitigation reliefWhen a delinquent borrower enters an agreement on a foreclosure alternative, the servicer is generally supposed to stop charging late fees. In the case of rules for COVID-19 modifications under Regulation X, servicers must waive some past charges.The bureau said it found some servicers weren't following these directives.Generic itemizationCiting rules in Regulation Z calling on servicers to provide "a brief description of the transaction" in billing statements, the CFPB said it called on some mortgage companies handling consumer payments to be a little more descriptive when they itemized charges after finding some weren't.To get an idea of what's not acceptable to the bureau, consider its description of one instance in which it reportedly found "the general label 'service fee'" used to correspond with "18 different fee types."Escrow issuesThe bureau also said it ran into issues with servicers not distributing money from escrow accounts in a timely way. That's something that's supposed to be done under Reg X so long as consumers aren't more than 30 days late."Examiners found servicers attempted to make timely escrow disbursements, but the payments did not reach the payees. The servicers did not resend the payments until months after," the bureau said.That led to late fees that the bureau found "servicers only reimbursed after the borrowers complained."Communication and records retentionThe CFPB also mentioned issues around borrower contact and reporting in its report, some of which could lead to improper fees.The bureau showed concern that some notifications servicers are supposed to provide to borrowers approved for expedited foreclosure prevention or alternatives broke rules against unfair and deceptive practices. Some borrowers reported as approved actually hadn't been, according to the CFPB.The bureau also found that other notices improperly indicated delinquency in cases where they shouldn't have because borrowers either had made all their payments, were testing a modification plan or had an "inactive" loan due to a payoff or short sale.The bureau also flagged shortcomings in notifications required under Reg X.These notifications are supposed to acknowledge receipt of loss mitigation applications, indicate if they are complete or not and provide timely information on deadlines for accepting offers, but instead they were missing this information.Other Reg X violations included following through with or documenting timely, good-faith, live customer contact that is supposed to occur within the first 36 days a payment is late.A similar concern was reported regarding "early intervention notices" that are supposed to be sent within the first 45 days borrowers are late on obligations "and against every 180 days thereafter." Finally, the CPFB also found that servicers in some cases failed to retain documentation that's supposed to be held for a year after a loan discharge or transfer.Kate Berry contributed reporting to this story.

CFPB offers specifics on servicing fees subject to crackdown2024-04-24T21:18:13+00:00

Figure Technology Solutions taps former SoFi exec as CEO

2024-04-24T18:16:41+00:00

Figure Technology Solutions, the parent company of Figure Lending, tapped Michael Tannenbaum, a former Brex and SoFi executive, to lead the company during its push to go public.The new CEO, whose experience in the financial services industry spans over 15 years, has helped companies scale and grow, which can strategically benefit Figure as it looks to increase its influence in the HELOC and financial services space.During a six year stint at Brex, an AI-powered spend platform, Tannenbaum increased the headcount of the company from a three person team in 2017 to more than 1,200 employee and to a multi-billion dollar valuation, a press release published Tuesday touted. He was the chief operating officer prior to his departure to Figure.Tannenbaum also served as a chief revenue officer at SoFi Technologies, a company that Mike Cagney, the founder of Figure used to oversee. Cagney and Tannenbuam worked together at SoFi for at least three years, LinkedIn shows.The executive will join Figure's board of directors effective immediately, the company announced Tuesday. Meanwhile, Cagney will shift into a new role of executive chairman. "We are excited to welcome Michael to Figure at a pivotal period of growth for the company," said Cagney in a press release. "Michael's outstanding track record of implementing transformative capital market solutions at global fintech companies, keen ability to attract and nurture top talent, and deep understanding of our business will be a significant asset to Figure."As Figure has set its course to go public, it has ramped up efforts to attract more mortgage lenders to use its technologies, possibly to better its valuation.In mid- April it opened the door for retail and wholesale lenders to use its DART system, a lien and eNote registry service. Soon after it launched a machine-learning-powered chatbot to improve its customer service and streamline its HELOC offerings. A month prior, Figure "submitted a draft registration statement on Form S-1 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), relating to the proposed initial public offering of its equity securities," it announced. Thus far, no determination has been made regarding the number of shares to be offered and the price range for the proposed offering. The offering is subject to market conditions as well as the completion of the SEC's review process, the company said.Companies tapped to take FTS public include Goldman Sachs Group Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Jefferies Financial Group Inc, a Bloomberg report pointed out. Valuation of the company is predicted to range between $2 billion to $3 billion.

Figure Technology Solutions taps former SoFi exec as CEO2024-04-24T18:16:41+00:00

Which party has the edge on housing? Polls say neither

2024-04-24T17:29:06+00:00

As housing affordability appears to be turning into a political priority in a pivotal election year, a recent poll suggests it is an issue that offers no party an advantage.The recent national survey from the University of Michigan and the Financial Times found Americans' own financial ability to afford a home ranked as a top concern by an almost equal 70% share of Democrats, Republicans and independent voters alike. Efforts to address housing issues are being enacted in red and blue regions of the country. "Housing remains one of the few areas of bipartisan agreement, and poll results are consistent with what's seen nationwide at the state and local levels," said Brian Connolly, assistant professor at University of Michigan's Ross School of Business.  The current level of housing prices is hitting all consumers, regardless of their income levels. A full 60% of poll respondents earning more than $100,000 per year listed their own ability to afford housing among their top three concerns, a "remarkable" result given their high levels of income, Connolly also noted. "It demonstrates the housing crisis poses problems far beyond low-income households," he said.Separate research from Clever Real Estate released this week determined that a first-time home buyer needed to earn almost $120,000 to afford the median-priced U.S. home with a 10% down payment. A typical household earns just under $75,000 today. Clever found only four states — Indiana, Iowa, Ohio and West Virginia — where a median-priced for-sale home was in reach for a median income. RELATED: What mortgage professionals think about the electionA 2024 study from Redfin also reported that housing affordability, which the brokerage said was at a record low, could factor into who a majority of voters eventually choose for president. Research was conducted prior to President Biden's State of the Union address, where home affordability emerged as a key talking point. Regardless of where individuals might stand, current efforts among state jurisdictions aimed at alleviating home affordability demonstrate how the issue crosses borders and political affiliations.   "For instance, in recent years, the Democratic-controlled legislatures in California and Massachusetts and the Republican-controlled legislatures in Montana and Utah have adopted remarkably similar measures to ease regulatory constraints on housing construction — reflecting a broad consensus that costs are a problem and the U.S. must make it easier to build needed housing," Connolly said. Moving beyond the effect of affordability on voters' individual financial circumstances, the Michigan-Financial Times survey showed diverging views on how significantly home prices figured in broader socioeconomic trends. The poll sampled approximately 1,000 voters across the country representing a range of socioeconomic groups.While a 57% share said home affordability's effect on overall economic growth was a top concern, Republicans tended to note it as a priority more frequently compared to Democrats. Older respondents also were more likely to mention housing cost's impact on economic growth.Approximately 38% and 36%, respectively, cited how affordability challenges might hinder efforts to make progress on racial and income segregation and environmental sustainability as a leading issue, with Democrats more likely to rank them in their top three. Nonwhite respondents, particularly, ranked them higher in importance, regardless of political affiliation, Connolly said.A greater share of Republicans and independents said home prices' effect on family and friends home buying potential was a top concern compared to Democrats. But overall, the data showed that "housing is a pocketbook issue," Connolly said. "By a wide margin, people are more concerned about their ability to afford housing where they want to live, rather than other problems associated with unaffordable housing."

Which party has the edge on housing? Polls say neither2024-04-24T17:29:06+00:00

Mr. Cooper's profits triple as servicing's fortunes improve

2024-04-24T16:17:19+00:00

Mr. Cooper's latest results staged a recovery from the previous fiscal period's earnings decline reflecting an interest-rate environment that shifted in servicers' favor.The mortgage company reported $181 million in net profit for the first quarter, up from $46 million in the last three months of 2024 and $37 million a year earlier.The nonbank's results add to other indications that some aspects of the first quarter's "higher for longer" rate scenario have had an upside for lenders with efficient servicing businesses."This environment is playing to the strengths of our balanced business model," said Mr. Cooper President Mike Weinbach in a press release.Automation the company is investing in leverages that strategy, executives said during an earnings call."Our technology strategy has benefited from our balanced business model," Mr. Cooper CEO Jay Bray said.While a settlement of intellectual property litigation over technology and depressed valuations of mortgage servicing rights put a dent in the previous quarter's earnings, automation and MSRs were more positive contributors during the first three months of this year.The company also is planning to see additional benefits from its partnership with Sagent, which allows Mr. Cooper to be the first to test the industry vendor's new Dara platform.Automated efficiencies helped servicing produce $273 million in pretax operating income during the quarter, according to the company. The equivalent figure for originations was $32 million, with that segment also benefiting from the application of automation to operations.Pretax operating income in servicing has grown steadily and somewhat in line with efficiencies of scale in its portfolio. It was up from $229 million the previous quarter and $157 million a year earlier.The company's servicing portfolio was just shy of $1.14 trillion in the first quarter, firmly above the 13-digit benchmark level that's long been its aspiration to maintain.While Mr. Cooper continued to be an avid purchaser of bulk MSRs in the quarter, executives indicated that its appetite was not endless and that it's keeping an eye both on whether pricing remains attractive and the soundness of its capital and liquidity.Mr. Cooper plans to add around $100 billion in UPB split between MSRs and subservicing to its portfolio in the second quarter, Weinbach said."After that, growth will depend on the yields available in the market," he added. "While we're optimistic about a continued robust supply and MSRs, we're also seeing some signs of aggressive pricing."Meanwhile, in originations, the unpaid principal balance of home loans funded during the first quarter was $2.9 billion, up slightly relative to $2.7 billion in both the fourth quarter of last year and the first three months of 2023. The majority of originations during the quarter came in through the correspondent channel, which generated $1.5 billion in loans during the period, compared to $1.4 billion from direct-to-consumer sources. In the previous quarter, Mr. Cooper funded $1.5 billion mortgages through the correspondent channel and $1.2 billion through direct-to-consumer. During first-quarter 2023, the company funded $1.4 billion in volume through direct-to-consumer and $1.3 billion via correspondent.

Mr. Cooper's profits triple as servicing's fortunes improve2024-04-24T16:17:19+00:00

Florida's home insurance industry may be worse than anyone realizes

2024-04-24T16:17:33+00:00

Seven property insurers in Florida went bankrupt in 2021 and 2022. The bankruptcies left thousands of homeowners scrambling to get new coverage, which often came with a big increase in cost. Worse, many had outstanding claims for hurricane damage that had not been addressed.Jacqueline Ravelo, a Miami homeowner, was among them. Her roof was damaged by Hurricane Irma in 2017.  Her insurance company, Avatar Property and Casualty, covered the cost of some repairs. But the roof continued to leak and mold grew inside the house, she said. Ravelo sued Avatar to compensate her for further repairs, which she said came to $50,000. When they were on the verge of settling, she said, the company went out of business.RELATED: Flood rule aims to strike a tricky balance on FHA loan costsAvatar and the six other companies that folded had something in common: They had all been rated A ("exceptional") or higher by Demotech, Inc., an Ohio-based insurance ratings firm. (One of those insurers was also rated A- by competitor AM Best Co. Inc.)In fact, nearly 20% of the companies doing business in Florida that Demotech rated as financially stable went insolvent during the period 2009 to 2022, according to a working paper by researchers at Harvard University, Columbia University and the Federal Reserve that was released by Harvard Business School in December. In their data sample, 99.7% of the ratings issued by Demotech were an A or above.That's a signal, the researchers said, that Florida's insurance market may be full of weak players and is even more  precarious than already known. "Our research shows that lax regulation and monitoring of property insurers makes Florida mortgage markets far more exposed to climate risk than people might think," said Parinitha Sastry, an author of the report and an assistant professor of finance at Columbia Business School. The paper has yet to be peer reviewed.The authors say this rating system also allows lenders making the riskiest mortgages to pass their liability on to everyone else.U.S. government-sponsored enterprises that secure mortgages — better known as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — demand that insurance meets a certain minimum quality standard.  That's especially important in places experiencing more severe catastrophes due to climate change, like Florida. When poor-quality insurance is graded as high-quality, it allows lenders in Florida to move mortgages for homes in vulnerable areas onto the books of Fannie and Freddie, who then bear the liability if they go south. Both GSEs will accept a rating from Demotech that is A or higher.Demotech's president and co-founder Joseph Petrelli disputed that his agency's ratings are inflated in any way, calling the paper a "hit job." He said he was "as surprised as anyone" when those seven firms declared insolvency, and that the real problem with the state insurance market is consumer and contractor fraud. Florida politicians have long blamed high insurance rates on excessive litigation: The state in recent years accounted for almost 80% of all U.S. lawsuits related to property claims, due in part to a rule that let homeowners transfer insurance benefits to contractors. Petrelli said litigation is escalating in a way his company couldn't have anticipated. He cited evidence of law firms backed by deep-pocketed investors that use search engine optimization to find homeowners who want repairs done, and then encourage them to bring suit. "They were targeting insurers," he said.Jesse Keenan, a Tulane University associate professor who researches the intersection of real estate and climate change and who was not involved with the Harvard analysis, said the findings are troubling. "It is pretty clear that Demotech ratings are not up to par with where you would expect them to be," Keenan said.Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae both declined to comment on Demotech's ratings. A spokesperson for Freddie Mac noted that the serious delinquency rate for U.S. single-family homes in its portfolio stood at 0.54% in February 2024, the lowest in nearly 20 years. That suggests the numbers are not yet bearing out the theory that they are taking particularly risky mortgages from Florida or anywhere else.Florida, which has embarked on a building boom in some of the most hurricane-prone territory in the world, is contending with a well-publicized insurance crisis. Rates are now the most expensive in the nation, according to an analysis by Insurify. The state-backed insurer of last resort is now the biggest home insurer in the state and carries more than $500 billion in exposure.The state's struggle to hold onto private insurers is what brought Demotech to Florida in the first place. In the wake of 1992's Hurricane Andrew, many Floridians were denied coverage by the private market. So they turned to the insurer of last resort, Citizens Property Insurance Corp. The state, for its part, tried to get people back onto private insurance. But many larger companies were shrinking their exposure to the riskiest markets.That left a lot of smaller, less diversified insurers with less capital to take their place. It's difficult for such insurers to get a top rating from AM Best or Moody's Corp., whose methodologies mark companies down for those very qualities. Demotech rates the smaller firms with a different methodology that it says is more appropriate to them. (Its website features a dragonfly and a T-Rex, noting it's the smaller animal that has evaded extinction.) This approach allows insurers a higher reinsurance to capital ratio. Unlike capital reserves, reinsurance can be canceled. Since 1990, both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have deemed companies with an A or better rating from Demotech as acceptable.Petrelli said that after Andrew, the then-commissioner of the Florida Office of Insurance (now the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation) begged Demotech to help the state, and in 1996 he agreed to. "We really stepped up" in a time of need, he said.Michael Yaworsky, the current commissioner of the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation (FLOIR), said he couldn't speak to the circumstances around Demotech entering the Florida market. In a very short time, however, Demotech went from having no business in Florida to rating at its peak well over half of property insurers there. The company rated 95% of the insurers who accepted policies being transferred from the state-back insurer, Citizens, according to the Harvard paper, allowing Florida to depopulate its state program. In 2012, 200,000 state policies were transferred to Demotech-approved insurers, the Harvard paper added.Using a database kept by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, the researchers tracked insurance company liquidations in Florida between 2009 and 2022. They found that "19% of Demotech insurers entered rehabilitation proceedings in the past decade, while none of the traditional insurers did."Petrelli criticized the researchers' methodology but said he wasn't surprised at the figure: After all, Demotech dominated the market, so it makes sense that a disproportionate share of the bankrupt companies would be its clients.Yaworsky said the Harvard study is based on "dated" information and rejected the idea that small insurers in Florida are weak. The main cause of insurance failure in the state in 2021 and 2022 was "pervasive and abusive insurance fraud," he said. Legislative reforms passed in 2022 are already turning the insurance market around, he says: Eight new insurers have entered the state. "Three insurers announced recently that they're actually going to be filing with us to reduce their property insurance rates," said Yaworsky. "This study cites data from over a decade ago. It seems to me that the market and the industry has moved on."There are fewer than a dozen companies registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to provide credit ratings for insurance companies in the U.S. Some are familiar names, like S&P Global Inc. But Demotech is rare in specializing in rating smaller companies. Only a few such companies have ratings accepted by Fannie and Freddie. Raters use different methodologies, and their grades don't necessarily match up. The authors of the study ran a model to compare Demotech's ratings to those of a larger competitor, AM Best. The researchers independently devised a facsimile of AM Best's model and then used it to rate nearly 50 Florida companies that Demotech had in fact rated. The exercise, they wrote, "suggests that the vast majority of these insurers would likely be rated 'junk' if they received their rating from a traditional rating agency rather than Demotech." Or in other words, if Demotech were to use AM Best's methodology, nearly two-thirds of its rated insurers would not meet Freddie Mac's standards and 21% would not meet Fannie Mae's. Petrelli said this is conjecture. He noted the authors themselves admit their "counterfactual" model only explains close to 60% of the variation between Demotech's and AM Best's ratings. He said his own analysis of public filings shows that Demotech companies rated A or higher have similar rates of trouble over a 10-year period as AM Best companies rated B+ or higher.Ishita Sen, a co-author and an assistant professor of finance at Harvard Business School, told Bloomberg Green that the GSEs could be powerful watchdogs on insurance raters if they updated their criteria, which they set "at some point way back in the 1990s, and over time have not evaluated whether these thresholds mean the same thing," she said.Freddie Mac said it "regularly reviews insurance rating requirements to make sure they align with our overall risk appetite." Fannie Mae said it periodically reviews rating requirements.  Petrelli said Demotech was accepted by Fannie and Freddie after extensive audits in 1989 and 1990. He said he assumes they must review that decision, but couldn't recall either asking him for additional information.Officially, it is not FLOIR's job to monitor insurance raters, but that does not mean that they and other Florida officials aren't watching closely. In fact, they've shown themselves to care passionately on the subject — just not in the way that might be expected.In 2022, as insurance bankruptcies were mounting, a number of companies received letters from Demotech informing them their ratings could drop, state officials said and news outlets reported at the time. Florida politicians, instead of applauding Demotech for caution, went on the attack. Yaworsky's predecessor at FLOIR, David Altmaier, accused the rater of wielding "inconsistent, monopolistic power."Florida's Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis wrote letters to Fannie and Freddie describing Demotech as a "rogue ratings agency" with a "dubious" methodology. He warned that if the lower ratings came to pass, it would cause financial chaos for millions of Floridians.In the end, Demotech downgraded only four of those insurers. But the message was clear: Downgrades are a political third rail.Patronis's office even commissioned a study to find alternatives to Demotech, which encouraged insurers to use multiple raters. Yaworsky said much of Florida's insurance market is now rated by more than one firm. Meanwhile, financial chaos has already come to some people who held A-rated insurance. After Avatar went under, Ravelo, the Miami homeowner, had to start her claims process all over with the Florida agency that guarantees insurance in case of failure. Almost seven years on from the original damage to her house, she has voluminous files but still awaits a payout.If her mortgage didn't require her to hold home insurance, she would now choose to go without it, she said: "I am paying $5,000 a year for insurance, but I'd rather pay nothing at all. I've lost faith in the system."

Florida's home insurance industry may be worse than anyone realizes2024-04-24T16:17:33+00:00

Potential buyers stay home during latest rate surge

2024-04-24T11:17:50+00:00

After two weeks of increases, loan application volumes retreated as rates surged to a five-month high, the Mortgage Bankers Association reported. The MBA's seasonally adjusted Market Composite Index, a weekly measure of application activity based on surveys of the trade group's members, declined 2.7% for the period ending April 19, with both purchases and refinances coming in lower. The fall largely reversed the 3.3% jump from seven days earlier, On a year-over-year basis, though, the index dropped 9.3%. The latest downturn came during the same week mortgage rates accelerated to its highest mark since November, leaving borrowers on the sidelines as a result, according to Joel Kan, MBA vice president and deputy chief economist. The average contract rate for the 30-year conforming mortgage with balances below $766,550 in most markets, clocked in at 7.24%, an 11 basis point increase from 7.13% in the prior survey. Points used to help buy down the rate averaged 0.66 compared to 0.65 seven days earlier for 80% loan-to-value ratio applications. The conforming rate increased for the third week in a row among MBA lenders, helping dissuade potential homeowners. "Purchase applications declined, as home buyers delayed their purchase decisions due to strained affordability and low supply," Kan said in a press release. The rising rates contributed to a seasonally adjusted 1% downward slide in the Purchase Index. Compared to the same survey period 12 months earlier, volumes were down 14.7%. Activity decreased last week even as the number of available listings shows ongoing gradual growth, but diminished affordability has squeezed out many in the purchase market, while lenders still struggle to attract customers. Many current trends creating challenged affordability are unlikely to recede in the near term, researchers across the housing market are now suggesting. With economic data from jobs to inflation all pointing to a healthy economy, financial markets rapidly repriced their interest rate expectations, according to Fannie Mae's April economic outlook. "While we still expect economic growth and inflation to moderate going forward — and, thus, for mortgage rates to drift downward — interest rates existing in a 'higher for longer' state seems to be an increasingly real possibility in the eyes of market participants, as well as some home buyers and sellers," said Hamilton Fout, Fannie Mae vice president, economic and strategic research, in a press release. "While we've recently seen evidence that some potential home sellers are becoming more acclimated to the higher mortgage rate environment and putting their homes on the market, the recent move upward in rates is yet another headwind to the recovery of home sales, and it intensifies long standing affordability challenges for consumers," Fout added.Falling in tandem with purchases last week, the MBA's Refinance Index also slowed by 5.6%, with most homeowners still hanging on to rates below current levels. In spite of the latest rise in interest rates, though, refinance volume managed to squeeze out a 3.3% gain from depressed lending activity of a year ago. The refinance share relative to total volume also fell week over week to 30.8% from 32.1%. Adjustable-rate mortgage applications saw an upturn, though, with the ARM Index up 2.1% thanks to conventional lending activity. "The ARM share of applications increased to 7.6%, consistent with the upward trend in rates, as buyers look to reduce their potential monthly payments," Kan said. The share of ARMs grew for the second week in a row after nabbing 7.3% of volume in the previous survey. The seasonally adjusted Government Index saw a greater pullback of 3.8% when compared to overall activity, even as federally backed purchases saw a slight uptick. The share of government-sponsored applications contracted as well, with Department of Veterans Affairs-guaranteed activity falling to 11.7% from 12.4% week over week. The drop was partially offset by the expansion of Federal Housing Administration-backed mortgages, which made up 12.8% compared to 12.3% in the prior survey. The portion of loans coming from U.S. Department of Agriculture programs equaled 0.4%, unchanged from the previous week. Alongside, the conforming average, interest rates finished higher across the board, with 30-year jumbo and FHA-sponsored mortgages both above 7%.The average contract rate of the 30-year jumbo increased to 7.45% from 7.4% one week prior. Points rose to 0.56 from 0.46 among 80% LTV-ratio loans. The 30-year FHA-backed home loan came in at an average rate of 7.01% compared to 6.9% seven days earlier. Borrowers typically used 0.94 worth of points, down from 0.99.Borrowers in 15-year contract mortgages saw an average rate of 6.75%, which represented an 11 basis point increase from 6.64% in the previous survey period. Points remained the same at 0.64 week over week. As with fixed averages, the 5/1 adjustable-rate mortgage increased to a mean of 6.64%, rising from 6.52%. Points used to buy down the rate, which starts on a fixed 60-month term, surged 27 basis points to 0.87 from 0.6.

Potential buyers stay home during latest rate surge2024-04-24T11:17:50+00:00

'Through the looking glass': Jamie Dimon sounds off on regulatory burden

2024-04-24T14:16:50+00:00

Jamie Dimon, chairman and chief executive officer of JPMorgan Chase, speaks Tuesday during an Economic Club of New York event.Victor J. Blue/Bloomberg JPMorgan Chase Chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon on Tuesday lambasted the bank regulatory environment while praising the American economy during an appearance at the Economic Club of New York.The longtime leader of the country's biggest bank said that he wished for better relations between business leaders and regulators, but he also took aim at the proposed Basel III endgame rules, hindrances to mergers and bureaucratic burdens. And he remained coy about whether he has interest in a future government post."I would love to have a more productive relationship with regulators, but I think it takes conversation," Dimon said. "I think we're kind of through the looking glass at this point."Dimon said that there are legitimate issues to fix in the banking system, but that not enough forethought is put into what regulators are trying to accomplish with various rules. He pointed to the migration of mortgages to nonbank lenders as an example, arguing that the trend has greatly diminished mortgages for low-income households.He also said that enhanced regulatory scrutiny has been making it harder for smaller banks. He contrasted their scarce resources with the $2 billion that JPMorgan spends annually on trading technology alone.Some of Dimon's qualms relate to what he sees as a dissonance between society's problems — such as the need for better education, upskilling the workforce and expanding access to homeownership — and the regulations being rolled out."I would like to see more collaboration between government and business regulators," Dimon said. "I think we're missing a lot of opportunities to help educate kids and get jobs and lift up parts of society. If you look at the government in America, less and less do you have practitioners at the table. That's true for regulators, it's true for cabinet members, it's true for people inside the government."Regarding last spring's turmoil, when Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank and First Republic Bank all collapsed, Dimon apportioned blame to both the banks and their regulators. JPMorgan acquired much of First Republic after the San Francisco-based bank was put into receivership last May."I don't know how that type of stuff happens, and I blame the banks," Dimon said. "I think the regulators also should blame themselves, but I blame the banks, CEOs for the most part, management teams."The "mini bank crisis" is likely over, as long as interest rates don't go up and trigger a recession, Dimon added. "Obviously if you're a bank with interest rate exposure, and you haven't protected yourself, you can be hurt in that," he said. "And obviously, it'll affect real estate, and so you can have this kind of double triple whammy affecting some banks."Dimon, who has recently been relatively downbeat about the U.S. economic outlook, said Tuesday that he is cautiously anticipating a soft economic landing. He added that even if there is a recession, the American consumer is wealthier and in better shape than before.When asked if holding a position in government is a real possibility for him, the 68-year-old chief executive quipped, "I've always said I'd love to be president, but you'd have to anoint me, folks."

'Through the looking glass': Jamie Dimon sounds off on regulatory burden2024-04-24T14:16:50+00:00

NVR profits approach $400 million

2024-04-24T03:18:23+00:00

Homebuilder NVR, Inc. saw profit growth slow to begin 2024, but results from both construction and mortgage segments point to sustained interest in newly built properties.The parent company of Ryan Homes, NVHomes and Heartland Homes reported net income of $394.3 million for the three months ending March 31, equivalent to $116.41 per diluted share. The number exceeded the consensus analyst expectation as reported by Yahoo Finance. Homebuilders have benefited from the ongoing shortage of existing single-family inventory over the past 12 months, much of it driven by current owners reluctant to sell and take on higher interest rates. While net income at Reston, Virginia-based NVR fell 3.8% from fourth-quarter profits of $410 million, the bottom line increased 14.5% from $344.4 million on a year-over-year basis. NVR's positive first-quarter earnings came out on the same day the U.S. government reported new-home sales also jumping up in March at their fastest pace since late summer. The new-home sales number showed a slightly different tale from other recently released March data, including for lending, which indicated signs of softness in the market later in the quarter. But any March slowing didn't prevent NVR from a $441.7 million quarterly boost in pre-tax income within the homebuilding division. The total dropped 2.8% from $454.3 million in late 2023, but rose 8.9% from $405.8 in the first quarter last year.While new-home lending may have slowed last month, NVR's mortgage banking unit still saw first-quarter income shoot up $29 million. The figure slipped down 2.4% from $29.7 million in the fourth quarter, but mortgage lending profits increased 3.4% from $28.1 million a year earlier.Mortgage income came off loan production of $1.38 billion between January and March, compared to $1.5 billion in fourth quarter 2023 and up from  $1.24 billion annually.Meanwhile, the mean price for new orders placed during the quarter sat at $454,300, rising a hair from $450,900 three months prior. Purchase transactions totaled 5,089 properties, down from 5,332 in the fourth quarter. Trends still signal a favorable environment for homebuilding in 2024, as existing housing for sale remains constrained. Market listings, though, are heading upward and outpacing the rate of sales, though, according to the latest housing forecast from Fannie Mae. Rising inventory should eventually moderate price growth overall, its researchers also suggested.  In its forecast, Fannie Mae revised sales expectations for newly built units downward through the middle of 2024 based on building trends in January and February, but said business would likely pick up in later months.Mortgage rates remain an ongoing challenge for consumers and lenders, with several housing organizations, including Fannie Mae, signaling they will linger at current levels and dash hopes of previously predicted pullbacks. 

NVR profits approach $400 million2024-04-24T03:18:23+00:00

If Supreme Court sides with CFPB, 'flurry' of litigation moves forward

2024-04-24T01:17:06+00:00

Many legal experts think the Supreme Court will rule in favor of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in a case challenging its funding. Such a ruling would unleash a flurry of litigation that has been on hold pending the outcome of the constitutional challenge. Bloomberg Creative The Supreme Court is expected to rule by the end of June on whether the funding structure for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is constitutional. If the court sides with payday lenders that sued the CFPB claiming its funding is unconstitutional, there would be massive fallout for other agencies, including the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. But many legal experts think the high court is more likely to rule in favor of the CFPB based on oral arguments heard in October when only one justice — Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor — questioned what remedy there should be if the agency's funding through the Federal Reserve System is found to be unconstitutional. Because the justices failed to devote much time to a remedy — and instead were highly skeptical that Congress improperly funded the bureau — many financial services industry lawyers are now gaming out what will happen to several rules and lawsuits that have been on hold pending the outcome of the case, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America."I expect the CFPB to win," said Alan Kaplinsky, senior counsel at Ballard Spahr, who expects the ruling has taken so long to decide due to split decisions by the justices. "There will be multiple opinions and dissenting opinions and probably concurring opinions, and it takes time to get all that done."  Several lawyers who filed amicus briefs on behalf of CFSA, the lead trade group for payday lenders that sued the CFPB in 2018, do not think the payday lenders will win, Kaplinsky said. The general view has been that Solicitor General Elizabeth Prologar, representing the CFPB, presented a stronger case than her counterpart, Noel J. Francisco, a former solicitor general representing the payday groups, who struggled during oral arguments to convince a majority of the justices that Congress had inappropriately delegated its authority to the CFPB. "They didn't ask the bureau or either party, how do we solve this? What's the solution?" said AJ Dhaliwal, a partner at the law firm Sheppard Mullin. "Because they didn't get into that, they can't blow [the CFPB] up."Michael Benoit, chairman of the law firm Hudson Cook LLP, said that if the Supreme Court sided with payday lenders, the impact on federal financial regulators would be enormous. "I've never felt the funding argument was very strong," Benoit said, adding that while the Supreme Court is not supposed to be political, "a decision that invalidates decades-long funding mechanisms would be a political earthquake in an election year — especially this election year."Many legal experts initially thought all of the CFPB's past rules and actions would be threatened when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit vacated the payday lending rule in 2022 and found that the CFPB's funding outside the congressional appropriations process violates the Constitution's separation of powers. Since then, challenges to the CFPB's funding have been part of nearly every legal brief in litigation filed against the agency in some way, shape or form, lawyers said. But since the oral arguments were held in October, there has been a reversal. Legal experts think a flood of litigation will be unleashed after the Supreme Court rules in the CFPB's favor. "It will be a flurry of activity," Kaplinsky said. Last year the CFPB embarked on a hiring spree in one of the largest recruitment drives at the agency in anticipation of litigation going forward. Three major rules currently on hold will move forward, including the payday lending rule, the small business data collection rule and a contentious anti-discrimination policy."There's a lull right now before the decision," Dhaliwal said. "The fall was extremely busy and since the New Year, it's gotten real quiet in part because of the Supreme Court decision that's going to come out."Meanwhile, nine enforcement actions and five petitions to enforce civil investigative demands have been stayed pending the outcome of the CFSA case, according to the CFPB."The CFPB is looking forward to the Court's decision, and in the meantime, we have continued to carry out the vital consumer protection work that Congress has charged us to perform," a CFPB spokesperson said.Among the rules that are on hold, the payday rule is the best example of how an agency rule can be locked in litigation for years. First developed and finalized in 2017 by former CFPB Director Richard Cordray, the payday rule was stripped of a provision requiring that lenders determine a borrowers' ability to repay a loan, and its original 2018 compliance date was postponed by a Texas judge after trade groups sued the bureau. What remains, if the rule gets enacted after the Supreme Court case, is a restriction that bars payday lenders from making more than two unsuccessful attempts to debit payment for a payday loan from a consumer's checking account. The restrictions were designed to protect borrowers from having their funds garnished by lenders and from incurring repeat overdraft charges.Meanwhile, the small-business data collection rule — known as 1071 for its section in the Dodd-Frank Act — would require that banks, credit unions and small-business lenders collect and report data on applications for credit, primarily to determine whether small-business loans are being made to women-owned and minority-owned small businesses. Last year, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas ruled that the CFPB had exceeded its statutory authority by expanding the data collected from lenders to 81 data points, far beyond the 13 mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act, and set aside the rule. Republicans in Congress, joined by a handful of Democrats, have sought unsuccessfully to nullify the rule.Another legal challenge involves a sweeping anti-discrimination policy that CFPB Director Rohit Chopra adopted in 2022 by making a change to the bureau's exam manual. The updated manual on the federal prohibition against "unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices," known as UDAAP, claimed discrimination in any financial product is an "unfair" practice that can trigger liability."The case is significant because the court issued the injunction based not only on the constitutional issue, but also on the CFPB exceeding its statutory authority," said Kaplinsky, adding that "there was no inkling at all that [UDAAP] intended to cover discrimination."Last year, a federal judge in Texas granted summary judgment and vacated the policy after finding that the CFPB exceeded statutory authority. If the CFPB prevails in the Supreme Court case, the district court's ruling would stand."Once the Supreme Court decision comes out, the CFPB will issue enforcement actions or proceed with litigation after-the-fact," Dhaliwal said. "They will be ready to pull the switch."

If Supreme Court sides with CFPB, 'flurry' of litigation moves forward2024-04-24T01:17:06+00:00
Go to Top